Showing posts with label accident. Show all posts
Showing posts with label accident. Show all posts

Wednesday, June 19, 2013

Accidents can happen everyday due to simple occurrences or negligence of other people. For example, the more people drive on the roads, the more likely it is that auto accidents will occur. Slips and falls and premise liability court cases happen because of someone's negligence. So, because accidents occur everyday, injuries are more likely to happen often.

If you've been injured in a slip and fall, premise injury, injured on someone else's property, or you've been injured in an assault, try to choose an attorney that specifically works or specializes in these areas. They have the most experience and background in the area and will help you win your case.

Online decision

Choosing an attorney that will represent your case to the fullest will be first and foremost once you have been in an accident and find yourself unable to get the money you deserve. A reputable and knowledgeable attorney will handle all the responsibility involved in an auto accident case. You won't have to worry about all the things that can happen with the guilty party and the insurance companies because your attorney will be in charge of those things.

Most of the time when someone is injured due to another's negligence, the matter is solved through the insurance company. The requirement in most states for drivers to have some sort of car liability insurance in case of an accident. Thus, finding legal services becomes a very important decision for some people. Selecting the best legal service can be done by going through Rocket Lawyer. If you've been in a car accident, try selecting a lawyer who specializes or whose background is in trying and winning car accident cases.

Consultation

Finding the best Lawyers can be done using a variety of online services. It does not have to be a complicated thing if you do your diligent search and do it the right way. Once you have found a few attorneys, call them to schedule a consultation. Most attorneys will offer a free consultation. During the consultation, the attorney will provide you with information about how they can help you with your case. During the consultation, make sure you ask the attorney questions too. Get to know the attorney. Find out their background, experience and knowledge.

Recommendations

There are a number of online resources that can help you find the best attorney like Rocket Lawyer legal services. Just because you've visited the attorney's office and it looks like everything is the way it is suppose to look, doesn't mean it is. Before you sign the contract, contact the bar associations' website in your state to find out information on a particular attorney. The bar association will list if an attorney is in good standing, has been suspended, or is inactive.

The site will also list any disciplinary actions or complaints against the attorney. On the bar association's website, it should list the lawyers' practice and ID number as well. You can also check the state's attorney board of ethics to find out if there are any disciplinary actions, complaints, or violations associated with the lawyer. You can also visit other sites that list licensed lawyers throughout the country.

Dorothy Oliver has written hundreds of articles on a variety of topics for more than seven years. She has worked as an Administrative Assistant for more than 15 years. She loves to travel and write. For more information about how to contact an attorney when you've been injured.

Friday, August 10, 2012

The government is planning to increase speeding fines by more than 66 per cent from £60 to £100. At a time when many people in the UK are experiencing financial hardship, the proposal has puzzled many motoring experts.

Excessive Speed
Speed is one of the main causes of injury on roads throughout Britain. Claims for whiplash compensation often result from accidents in which motorists have driven too closely to others at excessive speeds and government officials are keen to reduce the impact of compensation claims on the UK economy. Curbing speed, it is thought, should help to reduce accident rates.

Deterrent or Disingenuous?
Justice Secretary Ken Clarke estimates that raising fines for speeding motorists will generate an additional £30 million every year. The money, he argues, could be used to compensate crime victims. However, a victim's surcharge of £15 is already levied on offenders who are fined in court and there has been no suggestion that the surcharge will be altered to accommodate the proposed £40 rise in speeding fines. Critics, therefore, have condemned the government for planning to introduce another so-called stealth tax when motorists are already suffering from the effects of higher insurance premiums.

The increase might appear to be a veiled attempt to raise cash by a cash-strapped government, but will it also serve as a deterrent for speeding motorists? The simple answer is maybe. Nobody can predict how drivers will respond to the threat of a £100 speeding fine. Would law-breaking motorists suddenly change their driving habits if fines increase by £40? Is a £60 ticket not a sufficient deterrent? If not, would £100 be more effective? Why not £150 or £200? Why not £500? Though a line must be drawn somewhere, the principal objective of deterring dangerous driving perhaps ought not to assigned an arbitrary value.

Perhaps fines should not increase at all. It could also be argued that increasing fines to better support the victims of crime is futile. If more money were spent on policing the roads, installing speed cameras and improving road signage, would road traffic accidents not fall in proportion? Would fewer victims not require less support, thereby reducing their burden on the public purse? Claims for compensation have become an issue in the UK, so would it not be more prudent to propose ways in which the number of road accidents can be reduced rather than focus on fining offenders more?

Road Safety
Regardless of whether the proposed increase would serve as a deterrent or stealth tax, its reach would extend far beyond speeding motorists. In a bid to improve road safety, the rise in fines would also apply to motorists who fail to wear seatbelts and those who use mobile phones while driving. Drivers who ignore traffic signals and pedestrian crossings would also be affected by the increased penalty.

On this basis, it would be unreasonable to argue that higher fines are unfair, but on the issue of speeding the theory is less clear. Reported casualties among road users in Britain have been on the decline for a number of years. Speeding is still a serious problem in the UK, but traffic-calming measures, cameras and speed-awareness campaigns have already encouraged drivers to slow down. It remains to be seen whether higher fines would achieve the same.

For more motoring and car related information visit Hughes Carlisle.

By Sophie Banat